Review images
Score an image from 1 to 4 and list what is wrong with it, using a panel of reviewers. Two effort levels trade thoroughness for price.
POST /image/review scores one image and lists its defects and strengths. A
panel of vision models reviews the image independently, and Mynth merges their
verdicts. There is no model field. effort picks the panel.
import Mynth from "@mynthio/sdk";
const mynth = new Mynth();
const review = await mynth.image.review({
url: "https://cdn.example.com/lighthouse.png",
effort: "low",
});
console.log(review.score, review.summary);
for (const finding of review.findings) console.log(finding.severity, finding.finding);effort | Panel | Price | Use it for |
|---|---|---|---|
high (default) | five strong models | $0.30 | final checks on hero images |
low | three smaller models | $0.01 | triage at volume |
You pay only when the task succeeds. The body takes url and effort, and no
webhook or metadata. The SDK also accepts a file.
{
"score": 3,
"summary": "Clean composition with one visible defect in the left hand.",
"findings": [
{
"finding": "The left hand has six fingers",
"category": "anatomy",
"severity": "major",
"where": "Bottom left, the hand resting on the railing",
"confidence": "high"
}
],
"strengths": [{ "strength": "Warm, consistent lighting", "confidence": "medium" }]
}| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
score | 1 to 4, higher is better. The median of the reviewers' scores |
summary | A short prose summary |
finding | What is wrong, in plain language |
category | Usually anatomy, text, composition, artifact, color, or lighting. An open set |
severity | critical, major, or minor |
where | Where in the image, in plain language |
confidence | low, medium, or high: how strongly the reviewers agreed |
A finding or strength is reported only when at least two reviewers named it.
Treat category as a label, not an enum: an unusual defect gets its own
category. The rubric is revised from time to time, so compare scores taken
around the same time rather than across months.